Legal Opinion

In re: Erik Samuel De Jong and Daryl Lynn De Jong

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2018No. AZ-17-1280-FSBa AZ-17-1292-FSBaPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARIS, Bankruptcy Judge:

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 11 1 debtors Erik Samuel de Jong and Daryl Lynn de Jong (collectively "Debtors") refused to vacate appellee JLE-04 Parker, L.L.C.'s ("JLE") property for a period of months following termination of their lease. Instead, they continued their profitable dairy operation. After a trial, the bankruptcy court awarded JLE damages based on disgorgement of the relevant portion of the Debtors' net profits plus the value of silage, a form of cow feed, which the Debtors' cows consumed after the lease terminated. The court separately calculated the damages that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Harold Hall v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers Bodine Produce Company, Inc. Robert Fletcher, D/B/A Fletcher FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Donald Stacy v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Retz v. Samson (In Re Retz)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Orange County Nursery, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
  2. In re Orange County Nursery, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
  3. In re: David William Bartenwerfer and Kate Marie BartenwerferUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. In re: Francisco Ramirez Ramirez and Aurora Mendez BarajasUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API