Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund v. Safety Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 2, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

Safety Insurance Company (Safety) appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the plaintiff, the Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund (Fund). On cross motions for summary judgment, a judge in the Superior Court decided that Safety was required to pay to its policyholder uninsured motor vehicle benefits because the operator of the vehicle that struck him was uninsured, even though the owner of that vehicle carried insurance. Safety appealed and we granted its application for direct appellate review. We reverse.

1. Background. These facts are not disputed. On August 9, *3101999, Nichole…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cody v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Ferrari v. TotoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Goodman v. American Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Vokey v. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. QuaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund v. Premier InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Buccaneer Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  4. Giglio v. American Economy InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Commerce Insurance v. BlackburnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API