Legal Opinion

Carranza-De Salinas v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 23, 2007No. 05-60878PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

The Appellant, Petra Carranza-de Salinas (“Carranza”), petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) holding that she is ineligible to apply for relief from deportation based on former § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Carranza claims that she deferred her application for § 212(e) relief in order to establish a stronger record of rehabilitation, in reliance on the continued availability of § 212(c) relief. Because the BIA erred in finding her ineligible to apply for § 212(c) relief without allowing her the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Fernandez-Vargas v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Martin v. HadixSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Kuang-Te Wang v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Omari v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Hernandez De Anderson v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Joel Hernandez-De La Cruz v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Lovan v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Ivan Rodriguez Vazquez v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API