Legal Opinion

Cook v. Panhandle Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1924No. 9196PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVaughan, J.

On the 2d day of February, 1923, appellant, as plaintiff, instituted a suit No. 46070c in the- Forty-Fourth district court of Dallas county against Warren M. Beaman, Inc., Warren M.' Beaman, and G. E. Burton, as defendants, upon a promissory note in the sum of $740, with interest and attorney’s fees, and on said date applied for and obtained a writ of garnishment against the Panhandle Refining Company, a private corporation, appellee, said garnishment suit being numbered 40071b/e, and caused said writ to be duly served upon appellee as garnishee, requiring it to answer on the 2d day of April,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ames v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1894
  2. Dowell v. WintersTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. State ex rel. Hamilton v. GuinotteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Park Bros. v. Blodgett & Clapp Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  5. Bronson v. LeiboldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texas Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Campbell, Wise & Wright, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Bennett v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Carter v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Lubbock Independent School Dist. v. AbernathyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Caffarelli v. ReasonoverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API