Legal Opinion
Litman v. GEICO Casualty Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 21, 2023No. 2:22-cv-04530Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONALD LITMAN et al : Plaintiffs, : CIVIL ACTION NO. : v. : 22-cv-04530-RAL : GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY : Defendant. : RICHARD A. LLORET November 21, 2023 U.S. Magistrate Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant, GEICO Casualty Company (“GEICO”), has moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss Count II of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. Doc. No. 51.1 Count II alleges that GEICO acted in bad faith, pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 8371, in connection with its handling of Plaintiffs’ insurance claim. Doc.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.