Legal Opinion

Boquist v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1973No. 44103PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, Justice.

Writ of certiorari to the Workmen’s Compensation Commission to review its decision denying employee-relator simultane ous benefits for permanent total disability and permanent partial disability. We affirm.

Before injuries led to Ms eventual inability to work, Earl Boquist was a fork truck operator, employed by respondent, Dayton-Hudson Corporation. WMle so employed, he injured his left knee on a number of occasions between 1961 and 1963. After knee surgery in 1963, he returned to work and continued on a regular basis with only periodic loss of work time until August 8,1967,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hosking v. METROPOLITAN HOUSE MOVERS CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Mechling v. Jasper Stone CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tracy v. Streater/Litton IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Moes v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Umbreit v. Quality Tool, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Grimshaw v. L. Peter Larson Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Brannon v. Tampa TribuneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API