Boquist v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
Writ of certiorari to the Workmen’s Compensation Commission to review its decision denying employee-relator simultane ous benefits for permanent total disability and permanent partial disability. We affirm.
Before injuries led to Ms eventual inability to work, Earl Boquist was a fork truck operator, employed by respondent, Dayton-Hudson Corporation. WMle so employed, he injured his left knee on a number of occasions between 1961 and 1963. After knee surgery in 1963, he returned to work and continued on a regular basis with only periodic loss of work time until August 8,1967,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hosking v. METROPOLITAN HOUSE MOVERS CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Mechling v. Jasper Stone CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tracy v. Streater/Litton IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Moes v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Umbreit v. Quality Tool, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Grimshaw v. L. Peter Larson Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
- Brannon v. Tampa TribuneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.