Barger v. Durvin
New York Supreme Court
ACTION upon a promissory note. The defense was the statute of limitations. The opinion states all the material facts.
1Opinion of the CourtEmott, J.
Upon the trial of this action before me, without a jury, the making of the note described in the complaint was admitted. It was a joint and several note signed by all the defendants, dated in 1846, and due in May, 1847, for $500 and interest. The interest was paid and indorsed upon it in 1847 and 1848. In 1848, on the 5th day of August,, the defendants *69Taylor and Flagler, having become insolvent, made an assignment for the benefit of their credtors, to Edward Wells and Gilbert B. Hart. To this assignment were annexed schedules of the debts which the assignees were directed to pay, and among…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thompson v. PeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pickett v. . LeonardNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Pickett v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1861
- Ahlo v. Tai LungHawaii Supreme Court · 1893
- Allen v. O'DonaldUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
- Stuart v. FosterNew York Supreme Court · 1865
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.