Legal Opinion

Ahlo v. Tai Lung

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

*273Opinion op the Court, by

Judd, C.J.

This is an action of assumpsit to recover the balance due on a promissory note payable on demand made by Tai Lung Co. in favor of L. Ahlo for $764.20, dated the 2d-April, 1883. It appears that on the 14th June, 1885, the defendant, then being a storekeeper in Koliala, Hawaii, under the name of Tai Lung & Co., made an assignment of all his property to Elimo Pake and C. Bolte, to realize upon and distribute among his creditors pro rata. The assignees sold the property and paid dividends, to the creditors in 1886, one of 15 per cent, on February 11th, and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. RichardsNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Campbell v. BaldwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Pickett v. . LeonardNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Parsons v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Pickett v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1861

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richards Construction Company v. Air Conditioning Company of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. MontgomeryHawaii Supreme Court · 1950
  3. First Hawaiian Bank v. ZukerkornHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Lynch v. BlakeHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Maciel v. KaluaHawaii Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API