Legal Opinion
Pickett v. . Leonard
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 5, 1866PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On the 9th day of October, 1852, the firm of H. D.W. King executed and delivered to the plaintiff their promissory note for $256.64, payable one day after date.
On the 11th day of October, 1852, the same firm made a general assignment for the benefit of their creditors to McKenzie and Foster, directing, among other things, the "payment of all debts now due or now contracted, and hereafter to become due, against us, the said Hosea King Darius W. King, as such partners, to any person or persons whomsoever, for money actually borrowed, including a debt due the firm of I. H. Mirick for flour, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dunham v. . WatermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Denny v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Roosevelt v. MarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
- Barger v. DurvinNew York Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by18 opinions
- Harper v. . FairleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- American Woolen Co. v. . SamuelsohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Brooklyn Bank v. . BarnabyNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Murdock v. . WatermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Engmann v. Estate of ImmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.