Legal Opinion

Adams v. George

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1991No. 18298PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

The Adams’ complaint alleged that Carol J. George had purchased real property which was encumbered by a deed of trust granted by a preceding owner. The Adams alleged that this trust deed had been assigned to them; they claimed that appellant had assumed and agreed to pay the obligation it secured. They further alleged that the deed of trust had been foreclosed but that a deficiency remained with respect to the underlying obligation for which the trust deed had been given as security. They sought to recover from George the amount of the deficiency together with attorney fees…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rawson v. United Steelworkers of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Balboa Const. Co., Inc. v. GoldenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Siekman v. MolerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Greenland Vistas, Inc. v. Plantation Place Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  3. Biersack v. Oaks Renting, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Saro Investments v. Ocean Holiday PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Adams v. GeorgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API