Legal Opinion

Saro Investments v. Ocean Holiday Partnership

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 1994No. 2142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This case centers on rights under two promissory notes and a related wrap-around mortgage. This appeal is from the denial of Ocean Holiday Partnership’s (OHP) 1 motion under Rule 60(b)(5), SCRCP for relief from a prior judgment obtained against it by respondent, Saro Investments, on the ground it is no longer equitable that the prior judgment should have prospective application, 2 and from a post-judgment order granting Saro additional attorney fees. We reverse both the denial of relief to OHP and the increased award of attorney fees to Saro.

On November 3, 1984, Saro conveyed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cafe Associates, Ltd. v. GerngrossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Dedes v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Summers v. Consolidated Capital Special TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Coleman Ex Rel. Coleman v. DunlapSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Perry v. Heirs at Law of GadsdenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API