Legal Opinion

Chilson v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1930No. 27,696PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in a case tried to the court Avithout a jury.

This action is basqd upon an automobile liability policy and involves an “omnibus coverage clause” contained therein. This clause in referring to the coverage states;

“The unqualified word ‘Assured’ wherever used in this policy includes not only the named Assured but any other person or organization while legally using any such automobile * * * pro-Added that such use is Avith the permission of the named Assured

Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the company) issued its policy, in which Frank Crzeca, owner of an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Yapp v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Lowe v. NixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Crispo v. ConboySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Minneapolis Trust Co. v. BirkholzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Abrahamson v. LambersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Bolstad v. HovlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API