Legal Opinion

Frank v. Kluchesky

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The defendants state the issue as follows:

“1. Does Wis. Stats. 1939, section 66.05 (10) discriminate unconstitutionally in favor of wholesalers oí beer, and in favor of Class ‘B’ licensees or taverns, against' Class ‘A’ licensees, such as grocers and druggists, in preventing the latter from selling refrigerated beer ?
“2. Is the statutory prohibition of the sale of refrigerated beer by Class ‘A’ licensees, such as grocers and druggists, a valid exercise of the police power?
“3. Is the word “unrefrigerated” in section 66.05 (10) (f) so vague and indefinite as to fail of constitutionality?”

We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. State v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. SloweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lynch v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Doyle v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. City of Waukesha v. StathasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State Ex Rel. Lynch v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API