City of Waukesha v. Stathas
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
On this appeal defendant’s principal contentions are:
1. That, as section 1 of the city ordinance in question adopts by general reference “the provisions of chapter 176 of the Wisconsin statutes . . . and also all acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto, relating to the sale of intoxicating liquors, ... . so far as applicable,” without further specification or exception, such section is wholly void as an attempt on the part of the city to enact a series of crimes.
2. That the inclusion in such ordinance of a broad severa-bility clause does not permit a court to sever from the lan…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Keefe v. SchmiegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Frank v. KlucheskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Milwaukee v. HorvathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966