Legal Opinion

City of Waukesha v. Stathas

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

On this appeal defendant’s principal contentions are:

1. That, as section 1 of the city ordinance in question adopts by general reference “the provisions of chapter 176 of the Wisconsin statutes . . . and also all acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto, relating to the sale of intoxicating liquors, ... . so far as applicable,” without further specification or exception, such section is wholly void as an attempt on the part of the city to enact a series of crimes.

2. That the inclusion in such ordinance of a broad severa-bility clause does not permit a court to sever from the lan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Keefe v. SchmiegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Frank v. KlucheskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Milwaukee v. HorvathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API