Official Committee of Asbestos of G-I Holding, Inc. v. Heyman
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Samuel J. Heyman (“Hey-man”) moves pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the complaint of the Official Committee of Asbestos Claimants of G-I Holdings (the “Committee”) for failure to plead fraud with particularity and failure to state a cause of action.
For the foregoing reasons, that motion is denied.
Parties
The Committee is a committee of creditors appointed by the United States Trustee pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1102(a). The Committee is made up of persons who assert claims against G-I, as successor to GAF…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- In Re: Kensington International Limited and Springfield Associates, Llc, in Re: D.K. Acquisition Partners, L.P. Fernwood Associates, L.P. And Deutsche Bank Trust Company AmericasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Adelphia Communications Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Picard Ex Rel. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC v. Estate of Chais (In Re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.