Legal Opinion

Totten v. Burhans

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts ■are stated in the opinion, and in 91 Mich. 495.

1Opinion of the Court

McGrath, O. J.

For a statement of the facts herein, reference is made to 91 Mich. 495.

Twelve of the sixteen assignments of error relate to the admission of testimony, two to remarks of counsel made during the trial, one to instructions given by the court to the jury, and one to the refusal to direct a verdict for defendant.

1. The first assignment alleges error in permitting an .answer to a given question, but from the record it does mot appear that the question was answered.

2. Plaintiff was asked what was said, if anything, about 'Chase’s partnership, and what was the extent of it. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Denman v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Totten v. BurhansMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Pohlod v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Dehaan v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Lynch v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. ParksMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API