Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. Parks
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Assumpsit by Reid, Murdoch & Company against Jerome Parks for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff, from July 9, 1897, to August 19, 1897, inclusive, sold to the defendant various bills of groceries, amounting in the aggregate to $303.43 *364in value. On September 3, 1897, the plaintiff commenced an action of replevin to recover these goods on the claim that they were obtained fraudulently, and with intent not to pay for tliem. The writ and declaration covered all the goods sold between these dates, but the record shows that only a portion of the goods, amounting to $86.85, were recovered. The replevin case proceeded to judgment, which was in favor of the plaintiff for six cents…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farwell v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. FerrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Hinchman v. DoakMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Farwell v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Totten v. BurhansMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brooks v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Brewster Loud Lumber Co. v. General Builders' Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Fellows v. National Can Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1926
- Forest City Steel & Iron Co. v. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Friedberg v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.