Legal Opinion

Rodman v. Lofaso

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

In this article 78 proceeding, petitioner, a qualified voter and taxpayer in Union Free School District No. 21, Town of Oyster Bay, claiming that the trustees are violating the duty specifically enjoined upon them by section 1718 of the Education Law, seeks to review their action in over-expending the amount provided in the budget for “ legal services.” As adopted, the budget figure for .such services was $1,100. Legal .services are included in the budget under the heading 1 ‘ G-eneral Control— Code 2.5 ’ Code 2 of the budget was adopted by the voters on June 16, 1959 without discussion and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Fleischmann v. . GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Armitage v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Leone v. HunterNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Matter of Armitage v. Board of Educ., City of AuburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Armitage v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Board of Examiners of Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Richter v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API