Legal Opinion

Armitage v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1924PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Motion for a peremptory order of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.

The petitioner, Edith E. Armitage, a teacher in one of the Auburn grade schools, brings this proceeding for a peremptory mandamus order to compel the board of education of that city to adopt a resolution fixing her annual salary for the school year 1923-1924 at $1,600, pursuant to what she claims is the mandatory provision of article 33-B of the Education Law.

The case turns on the construction to be given to section 888 of that law. Briefly stated, the question involved is whether that section, as now amended, compels the various boards of education in cities of the third class to increase…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Struthers Wells Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Bullock v. . CooleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Orinoco Realty Co. v. . BandlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re the Appraisal under the Transfer Tax Law of the Property of DavisonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  2. O'Tier v. SellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Onondaga Water Service Corp. v. Crown Mills, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People ex rel. Barnes v. Warden of WorkhouseNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  5. McMaster v. OwensNew York Supreme Court · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API