Legal Opinion
Matter of Fleischmann v. . Graves
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 27, 1923PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
We held in Matter of Emerson v. Buck (230 N. Y. 380) that the board of education in the city of Buffalo under the Education Law (Cons. Laws, eh. 16) could engage such teachers and employees as it thought necessary, and fix their compensation, but that the total amount of its budget or estimate for the year was subject to limitation and reduction by the city council. That litigation was the result of a reduction made by the city council in the estimates which were submitted by the board of education for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1921. The board believing that under the Education Law, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gunnison v. . Bd. of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People Ex Rel. Wells Newton Co. v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of Hirshfield v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Matter of Emerson v. . BuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Judson v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Cahn v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Matter of Divisich v. MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Lewis v. Bd. of Education of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Matter of McNutt Co. v. EckertNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Corwin v. FarrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.