Legal Opinion

Wright v. Gifford-Hill & Co., Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1987No. C-5263PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Justice.

This case requires us to decide whether a plaintiff must obtain a jury finding on the amount of actual damages as a prerequisite to recovery of exemplary damages under TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 8306 § 5. We hold she does not.

Charles Wright was killed while attempting to repair a cement mixer at the Gifford-Hill & Company pipe plant where he was employed. His wife, Reva U. Wright, brought this suit to recover exemplary damages for the death of her husband alleging Gifford-Hill had failed to provide him with a safe place to work.

At the close of trial, Mrs. Wright requested…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Nabours v. Longview Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Doubleday & Co., Inc. v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bennett v. HowardTexas Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Leitch v. HornsbyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. EllenderTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. GTE Southwest, Inc. v. BruceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Chrysler Insurance Co. v. Greenspoint Dodge of Houston, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2009

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API