Nabours v. Longview Savings & Loan Ass'n
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GONZALEZ, Justice.
This controversy arose when Metropolitan Savings & Loan Association (now Long-view Savings & Loan Association) sought *902to foreclose on a vendor’s lien it held on the Nabours’ home. The Nabours sued to prevent the foreclosure and to recover damages. The jury found that Longview had waived its right to foreclose, that it had made false statements in connection with the foreclosure notices, and that it acted with malice. However, the jury found that the Nabours had suffered no actual damages. They did award punitive damages and attorney’s fees. The court of appeals, with one…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- International Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. HollowayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Amoco Production Co. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- Lesikar v. Rappeport, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Streber v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Wright v. Gifford-Hill & Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Vickery v. VickeryTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Scott v. Sebree, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.