Legal Opinion

Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Edwards

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1997No. 95-1270PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, Justice

The sole point of controversy in this case is the award of punitive damages. In Texas, a corporation may be liable for exemplary damages if it committed gross negligence through the actions or inactions of a vice principal. The court of appeals held that there was some evidence that the leasing agent of a corporate owner of an apartment complex was a vice principal and accordingly modified the trial court’s judgment which had disregarded the gross negligence and punitive damages findings. Edwards v. Hammerly Oaks, Inc., 908 S.W.2d 270 (Tex.App.—Hous.[1st Dist]1995). We hold that under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Clayton W. Williams, Jr., Inc. v. OlivoTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In the Interest of E.N.C., J.A.C., S.A.L., N.A.G. and C.G.L.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. EllenderTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. GonzalezTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Central Ready Mix Concrete Co. v. IslasTexas Supreme Court · 2007

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API