Herron v. CENTURY BMW
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge
This case concerns the enforceability of an arbitration agreement. Respondents Christine and Michael Watts entered into a contract with Appellant Century BMW (Century) for the purchase of a car. The transaction included the execution of an arbitration agreement. Subsequently, the Wattses filed a class action suit against Century alleging the dealership had charged illegal administrative fees. Century moved to compel arbitration. The trial court found the arbitration agreement was unconscionable and unenforceable and denied the motion to compel. Century appealed, and we granted certification…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Munoz v. Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Simpson v. MSA of Myrtle Beach, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Scott v. Cingular WirelessWashington Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Herron v. CENTURY BMWSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Robinson v. Title Lenders, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- York v. Dodgeland of Columbia, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- Maracich v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Sonic Automotive, Inc. v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.