Robles v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This petition for review of an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission was considered on the briefs and appendices filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. The Commission’s order imposing remedial sanctions on petitioner was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law. See Dearlove v. SEC, 573 F.3d 801, 804 (D.C.Cir.2009), citing 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), and Nat’l Rural Elec. Coop. Ass’n v. SEC, 276 F.3d 609, 614 (D.C.Cir. 2002).…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Steadman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Rural Electric Cooperative Ass'n v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Dearlove v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
4Cited by1 opinion
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Pentagon Capital Management PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012