Legal Opinion

260 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. Scychel

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNull, J.

The action is for the equitable reformation of agreements of employment alleged to have been made with the individual defendants at various times between October, 1938, and January, 1942. It is alleged that these agreements, presumably oral, were based upon and included the terms and provision of certain written master collective bargaining agreements executed between the defendants Realty Advisory Board bn Labor Relations, Inc., and Building Service Employees’ International Union, Local 32-B.

*190Although the plaintiffs assert that the action is not directed to the master collective bargaining…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Karolyna Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  2. Greenberg v. Arsenal Bldg. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  3. Walsh v. 515 Madison Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Walsh v. 515 Madison Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  5. Wolf v. BellNew York Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 260 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. ScychelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API