Legal Opinion

Koch v. Rice

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1951Published

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

This suit was instituted under the provisions of §§ 67-601 to 67-607, inclusive, O.C.L.A., to foreclose an asserted lien for labor, skill and materials expended upon a chattel.

Defendant was owner of a tractor described as a 1937 D6 caterpillar. It had originally been equipped with a “bulldozer” blade, which is a steel blade affixed to the front of a tractor by heavy steel arms, and is used principally in moving earth in grading operations and the like. The blade is raised and lowered by a power control unit, usually installed on the rear end of the tractor. Prom defendant’s tractor the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ward v. TOWN TAVERNOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pippy v. WinslowOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. McMillan v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Stubblefield v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hoskins v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API