Legal Opinion
Monfort, Inc. v. Rangel
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 26, 1993No. 92CE0006PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PIERCE.
On petition of the self-insured employer, Monfort, Inc. (Monfort), in this workers’ compensation case, we granted certiorari to determine whether the correct standard or definition of “substantial permanent aggravation” under § 8-41-304(1), C.R.S. (1992 Cum.Supp.) was applied in awarding the claimant temporary disability and medical benefits. We conclude that the proper standard was applied, and therefore, we affirm the order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office.
Victor L. Rangel, claimant, was employed by Monfort for a period of a few weeks in July and August 1991.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Danielson v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- May D & F v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Blue River Defense Com. v. Town of SilverthorneColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Metro Moving & Storage Co. v. GussertColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Christie v. Coors Transportation Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ward v. Department of Natural ResourcesColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Delta Drywall v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Robbins Flower Shop v. CineaColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.