Legal Opinion · Dissent

Electron Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1992No. 90CA0544Published

1Dissent

Judge MARQUEZ

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

The majority’s reliance on Climax Molybdenum Co. v. Walter, 812 P.2d 1168 (Colo.1991) fails to consider significant factual and legal differences between that case and the one at issue here. In both cases the workers sustained multiple disabilities while employed by a single employer. However, the worker in Climax was permanently and totally disabled by the combined effect of two accidental injuries and an occupational disease. Significantly, the occupational disease was the final disabling injury. As a result, the employer in Climax was liable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Gallegos v. PhippsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Tassian v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. Stevenson v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API