Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Steinberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1977No. Civ. 48377PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

Petitioner Sylvia Steinberg appeals from a judgment “on bifurcated issues” which divided the community property of the parties. Respondent here and below is Samuel Steinberg.

Background

This is the third trial and second appeal in this dissolution action, first filed in August 1969.

The parties were married in 1965, when Sylvia was 65 years old and Samuel was 60. Samuel owned various assets when they married; Sylvia owned nothing. Samuel was employed as a baker until some time after the parties separated. Sylvia was unemployed; her only income was from social security. They…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Alvarez v. Felker Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of SheldonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. McCoy v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. In Re Marriage of FransenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. In Re Marriage of HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API