Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Dyer

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 27, 2007No. File No. CV-07-5001166-SPublished

1Opinion of the CourtVacchelli, J.

This case is an action to collect a debt due on a promissory note made in connection with the sale of a real estate agent’s business. The plaintiff, Patricia Harrington, alleges that she sold her real estate business to the defendant, Kathy A. Dyer, that Dyer executed a promissory note in payment and that Dyer is in default on the note. Harrington has made an application for a prejudgment remedy seeking to garnish 20 percent of Dyer’s net real estate commissions earned, and expected to be earned in the future, up to the total amount of $56,641.67. For the following reasons, the court denies…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nazami v. Patrons Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Dainty Rubbish Service, Inc. v. Beacon Hill Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Fischel v. TKPK, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. William M. Raveis & Associates, Inc. v. KimballSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. BRJM, LLC v. Output Systems, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API