Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re N.J. A.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1999No. 97-1146Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Abbott

I agree with the Court’s conclusion that the trial court had jurisdiction over N. J.A. I dissent from the Court’s judgment, however, because I believe that the trial court’s jurisdiction was not limited to considering a transfer under Family Code section 54.02(i). To the contrary, I believe the trial court had the authority to adjudicate N.J.A. I also dissent because I believe the Court misreads and misapplies Family Code section 54.05 concerning dispositions and section 54.03 concerning adjudications.

I

N.J.A. was sixteen years old the night she engaged in delinquent conduct. As that night…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Withers v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  2. J.K.A. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Murphy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. J.B.S., Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. In re N.J.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API