J.K.A. v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANNON, Justice.
Appellant J.K.A. was adjudicated to have engaged in delinquent conduct. At a disposition hearing he was committed to the Texas Youth Commission (“TYC”) but given probation. He violated a rule of probation, and the State moved to modify the disposition. J.K.A. appeals the modified disposition. We affirm.
Facts
On September 18, 1991, a juvenile court found that J.K.A. had engaged in delinquent conduct, i.e., burglary. The court committed him to the TYC but suspended the commitment. The court placed him in the custody of his mother under the supervision of the Juvenile…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. AtwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Roberson Farm Equipment Company v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Atwood v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- In re S.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
3Cited by16 opinions
- Zaidi v. ShahCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- In re S.J.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- in the Matter of J. G., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- In Re Jg, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.