Legal Opinion

Duke v. Scott

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chattiu

W. J. Duke, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner, was employed as a carpenter in 1947 by the Tennessee Department of Corrections and was assigned to various contractors for payroll and unemployment compensation purposes. The last contractor to which he was assigned was one of the respondents to this action, Southern Contractors, Inc.

On January 3, 1964, petitioner received a separation notice because of the lack of work which carried thereon a notation, “told to report back in two weeks if work not found.”

On January 6, 1964, petitioner filed a claim for unemployment compensation. He did…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Milne Chair Co. v. HakeTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Moore v. Commissioner of Employment SecurityTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Ezell v. HakeTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Gray v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Bank v. JohnstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Russell v. WillisTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
  3. Aladdin Industries, Inc. v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Jackson v. BibleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  5. DePriest v. BibleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API