Legal Opinion

United States v. Turner

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 22, 1992No. ACM S28163 (reh)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT UPON REHEARING

LEONARD, Senior Judge:

If an accused received a sentence at his original trial that included a punitive discharge, but no confinement, should the military judge’s rehearing sentencing instructions inform the members that they may adjudge confinement as a lesser punishment instead of the punitive discharge? We hold the military judge should have so instructed and take corrective action on appellant’s sentence.

In June 1989, a special court-martial found appellant guilty of larceny of military property of the United States and sentenced him to a bad-conduct…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. KelleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. TurnerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. ThompsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. GrayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API