Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Turner

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 7, 1990No. ACM S28163PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LEONARD, Senior Judge:

Appellant was convicted of stealing an oscilloscope, military property of the United States, of a value of about $1,999.75. On appeal to us appellant asserts eleven errors. We find limited merit in one assertion and we set aside appellant’s sentence because of an unasserted error.

I

Appellant asserts he was prejudiced by the military judge allowing trial counsel, over defense objection, to elicit evidence that appellant refused to consent to a search of his home.

Trial counsel elicited the following evidence from Special Agent Gardner. When appellant was questioned…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. BreeseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  5. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. EdwardsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. GrayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. MobleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. AlfordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API