Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Tredway

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1901No. Sac. No. 772PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Plaintiff, as assignee, brings an action of foreclosure of mortgage against defendants, the mortgagors. He became the purchaser of the property at the sale, and, six months thereafter, receiving his deed, he made an application for a writ of assistance, which writ was ordered issued. The present appeal is now prosecuted by defendants from the order granting the writ of assistance. At the time the mortgage was executed the statutory right of redemption was limited to six months after the sale. At the time of the foreclosure sale the statute had been so amended that the right to redeem existed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. CushmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Savings Bank of San Diego v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Stadium Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Welsh v. CrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. First National Bank of Turtle Lake v. Bovey, Shute & Jackson, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Malone v. RoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. United States v. Stadium Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API