Legal Opinion

Kania v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1973No. 327PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs argue that the motion to strike was the equivalent of a demurrer because their claim for treble damages is a separate cause of action, relying on Chrome Plating Co. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. (1942), 241 Wis. 554, 6 N. W. 2d 692. In that case we held that the record would not sustain a recovery on grounds of ordinary negligence. The case was tried on the basis of liability for treble damages under sec. 196.64, Stats. We held this required proof of a wilful and wanton violation, and precluded comparison of negligence. In the Chrome Plating Co. Case, as well as the other cases…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Chrome Plating Co. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gauger v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Whittier v. AtkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peissig v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kania v. CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANYWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API