Legal Opinion
Inhabitants of Plainfield v. Palmer
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 6, 1934No. 5412PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
The Angelo Paino Construction Corporation, hereinafter called the contractor (later superseded by its trustee in bankruptcy), brought this suit against the municipality of Plainfield, New Jersey, for the balance due on a contract for the construction of a reenforced concrete monolithic sewer. It was to be made in certain dimensions and be composed of concrete of different grades for different places in the structure; Class A to show a minimum twenty-eight day compressive strength of 3,000 pounds to the square inch and Class B a like compressive strength of 2',500‘…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. Walsh Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- City of St. Charles v. StookeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Omaha Water Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Walsh Const. Co. v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1920
- Loh v. Broadway Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
3Cited by5 opinions
- Warden v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Hazeltine Corporation v. AbramsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1934
- United States ex rel. Browne & Bryan Lumber Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Cutler v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962