Legal Opinion
Hazeltine Corporation v. Abrams
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 6, 1934No. 7238PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement suit in which infringement is alleged of letters patent No. 1,879,863', issued September 27, 1932, to Harold A. Wheeler on an original application filed July 7, 192.7, divided and then filed on November 13, 1930.
The patent relates to the radio art, and particularly to means for controlling volume control in a receiving set.
In the course of the trial the suit as against the defendants Emerson Television-Radio, Inc., and Emerson Radio & Phonograph Corporation was dismissed because neither corporation has a regular and established place of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bowers v. Atlantic, G. & P. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
- Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. American Neon Light CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Saxlehner v. EisnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Kintner v. Atlantic Communication Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Detrola Radio & Television Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Consolidated Electrodynamics Corporation, a Corporation v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Detrola Radio & Televison Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Hazeltine Corporation v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Hazeltine Corp. v. R. E. B. Service Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.