Legal Opinion
Boston Tow Boat Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 3, 1944No. 385PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
Appellant, Boston Tow Boat Company, was an intervenor in the proceedings before the Interstate Commerce Commission leading to the Commission’s decision against the Cornell Steamboat Company which we today have held was properly sustained by the District Court. Cornell Steamboat Co. v. United States, post, p. 634. When Cornell attacked the Commission’s order in the District Court, Boston again intervened. 53 F. Supp. 349. Its petition for intervention, granted by the District Court, alleged that it operated tugboats in and about Boston harbor which rendered services somewhat similar to those…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Alexander Sprunt & Son, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States of America v. Avx Corporation, National Wildlife Federation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Edward Crowell v. State Public Defender v. Iowa District Court for Linn CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Tachiona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.