Legal Opinion

C. & N. Rwy. Co. v. Picard

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 1929No. Appeal 251PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Defendant, the consignee under an order bill of lading of a car of bran, notified the plaintiff , in writing to reconsign the shipment to his, defendant’s, own order at Milford, Delaware, Pennsylvania Railroad delivery, “Notify J. E. Holland;” and in the reconsignment order requested the plaintiff company to “prepay freight and all charges.” The plaintiff did so, the car was delivered as ordered, and the plaintiff brought this action for the freight charges.

Defendant seeks to escape payment by averring in his affidavit of defense that on March 6, 1924, two days after he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Whitney & KemmererSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Ammon v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Davis v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. RothsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. RubinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Tentzer v. Reading CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Trinidad Bean & Elevator Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  5. Zimmerman's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API