Davis v. Richardson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment against defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. An appeal in such case is intended to reach only clear cases of error in law and prevent the delay incident to a trial: Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co., 225 Pa. 143. If there is any doubt of the plaintiff’s right to a judgment on the pleadings, the appeal should be dismissed and the case remitted for trial.
The action was by a carrier for an inadvertent undercharge on an interstate shipment. The car was originally shipped by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Davis v. Akron Feed & M. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. BaerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reading Co. v. SobelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Andrews Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- C. & N. Rwy. Co. v. PicardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Trinidad Bean & Elevator Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- Pacific Electric Railway Co. v. Wetherill, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.