Legal Opinion

Davis v. Richardson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1925No. Appeal, 164PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment against defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. An appeal in such case is intended to reach only clear cases of error in law and prevent the delay incident to a trial: Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co., 225 Pa. 143. If there is any doubt of the plaintiff’s right to a judgment on the pleadings, the appeal should be dismissed and the case remitted for trial.

The action was by a carrier for an inadvertent undercharge on an interstate shipment. The car was originally shipped by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Davis v. Akron Feed & M. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  4. Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. BaerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reading Co. v. SobelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Andrews Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. C. & N. Rwy. Co. v. PicardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Trinidad Bean & Elevator Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  5. Pacific Electric Railway Co. v. Wetherill, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API