Legal Opinion

Tentzer v. Reading Company

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1930No. Appeal 66PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller., J.,

This is an action by a consignee and owner of goods who ordered them reconsigned to a third person, against a common carrier for damages for failure to make delivery of the shipment.

The court below entered a compulsory nonsuit— which it subsequently refused to take off — on two grounds: (1) Because there was no sufficient evidence of non-delivery of the shipment; (2) because, having ordered the shipment reconsigned to another person, the plaintiff could not maintain the action. We think the court was wrong in both positions.(1) The plaintiff’s statement averred, inter…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rothstein v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Taxin v. Pennsylvania Railroad, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API