Faison v. Vickers

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 HENRY FAISON, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-01437 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OR 9 AMEND COMPLAINT v. 10 PAUL VICKERS; HARBORVIEW 11 HOSPITAL, 12 Defendants. 13 14 1. INTRODUCTION 15 The Court raises this matter sua sponte. Pro se Plaintiff Henry Faison 16 pursues this action in forma pauperis (IFP). Dkt. No. 4. Having closely reviewed the 17 docket, the law, and the parties’ filings, the Court, being fully informed, finds that 18 Faison fails to assert a basis for the Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. See Fed R.…