Legal Opinion
Brown v. Miller
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 22, 1923No. 10984PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKknnamer, J.
Thf plaintiff in erroi,. Clarence Brown, is a full-blood Chickasaw Indian, and the land involved is .a portion of his surplus allotment. By order of the Secretary of the Interior on April 20, 1906, the restrictions upon alienation- of the said land were removed, to he effective 30 days from the date of the order. On May 21, 1906, the plaintiff in error executed and delivered a deed conveying the said land to Stillwell H. Russell. ' The defendants in error are-present or past owners of the said land in a chain of title from said Stillwell H. Russell. The action was commenced by the plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Thompson v. TolmieSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Washington v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People ex rel. Keeney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Crosbie v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Protest of Chicago, R, I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. CapshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Quinton Belief Oil & Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- City of Tahlequah ex rel. Johnston v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Childers v. PaulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.