Legal Opinion

Raymond D. Jackson v. Duncan A. McIntosh David Victorino

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1996No. 94-16741PublishedCited by 1,113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

Raymond D. Jackson, a state prisoner on dialysis, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 contending that Dr. Duncan McIntosh and Dr. David Victorino had violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment by refusing him a kidney transplant. The doctors moved for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity. The district court denied the motion. The doctors appeal.

ANALYSIS

The doctors contend that they are entitled to qualified immunity because there was no clearly established law requiring them to provide a kidney transplant to a prisoner on dialysis. The doctors…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Eric Sanchez v. Duane R. VildCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,113 opinions

  1. Toguchi v. Soon Hwang ChungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Wilhelm v. RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Lance Jett v. M. Penner, D. Peterson, and Cheryl K. Pliler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Philip Rosati v. Dr. IgbinosoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

1,108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API