Sapp v. Christie Bros.

Good, C.

This cause is now before us upon a rehearing. The • former opinion is reported, ante, p. 701, where a statement of the facts essential to an understanding of, the case will be found.

At the outset it may be well, perhaps, to state that we think the following language used in the former opinion: “The relation of master and servant or of employer and employee did not exist, and no contractual obligation was assumed until after all the elements of danger to which he exposed-himself by entering upon the service had be*706come fully known to him” — is somewhat misleading, and is an erroneous…