Cain v. Aetna Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of Aetna Life Insurance Company (Aetna), we are called upon to decide whether a contract for temporary insurance existed between the parties. The record before us reveals the following facts.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff-appellant Jerome M. Cain (Cain) was employed by the Keystone Machine Company (Keystone). The company’s owner, Donald L. Shurwin, desired to obtain group health insurance for his employees. He contacted Marita Greene, an independent insurance agent, who represented a number of insurance companies, including…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Gaunt v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Simses v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Grandpre v. Northwestern Insurance Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HesterIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Anderson v. Country Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Poston v. National Fidelity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Services Holding Co. v. Transamerica Occidental Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Towers Condominium Ass'n v. C.E. Brathwaite & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.