Legal Opinion

Cromwell v. Ripley

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 8, 1971No. 360, September Term, 1970PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

An action brought against a dead man is a nullity. Burket v. Aldridge, Adm’r., 241 Md. 423, 430; Hunt v. Tague, 205 Md. 369, 378-79. This case was a farrago of questions from the initiation of the suit in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County to the denial of the court to vacate a judgment in favor of the appellee for costs. The questions arose in large measure because appellant brought an action against a man who had been dead for almost ten months. The declaration filed on 3 May 1968 by Eldred A. Cromwell, appellant here and plaintiff below, alleged that the negligence of Ralph P. Ripley,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Waldman v. RohrbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Mumford v. Staton, Whaley & PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Hoover v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Tiller v. ElfenbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. Clarke Baridon, Inc. v. Union Asbestos & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Brewer v. MeleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Walko Corp. v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Bartholomee v. CaseyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Henley v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API